Singular Movement
String Base Identity: kim
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 181,000,000 | 181,000,000 | ||
| Yahoo | 672,000,000 | 671,000,000 | +1,000,000 |
| Bing | 654,000,000 | 655,000,000 | -1,000,000 |
Singular Movement
String Base Identity: tim
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 1,220,000,000 | 1,200,000,000 | +20,000,000 | |
| Yahoo | 320,000,000 | 320,000,000 | |
| Bing | 321,000,000 | 321,000,000 |
Singular Movement
String Base Identity: jim
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 109,000,000 | 933,000,000 | -824,000,000 | |
| Yahoo | 631,000,000 | 631,000,000 | |
| Bing | 626,000,000 | 626,000,000 |
Singular Movement
String Base Identity: vestor
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 1,370,000 | 1,380,000 | -10,000 | |
| Yahoo | 253,000 | 251,000 | +20,000 |
| Bing | 254,000 | 257,000 | -30,000 |
Singular Movement
String Base Identity: dotcom
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 20,600,000 | 20,900,000 | -300,000 | |
| Yahoo | 23,400,000 | 23,500,000 | -100,000 |
| Bing | 23,400,000 | 23,400,000 |
? Movement not consistent with more visible and/or common variables in play, minor shift
!?! Movement not consistent with more visible and/or common variables in play, major shift
With a slim chance of event explanation being nailed down to a specific, could there be a tie-in with another string derivative dump earlier in the week with the plural megaload string? With the wiggling and jiggling in the vestor and dotcom markets, along with the pairing of a one million add to the Yahoo and Bing indexes with the kim string, this 9-digit page count disappearance can cause at least a blink of an eye, but whether or not a speck of dust is making ones eyes water after the blink or something else is not clearly identifiable from this one major drop