Singular Movement
String Base Identity: kim
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 1,350,000,00 | 181,000,000 | +1,169,000,000 | |
| Yahoo | 671,000,000 | 672,000,000 | -1,000,000 |
| Bing | 654,000,000 | 654,000,000 |
Singular Movement
String Base Identity: tim
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 1,220,000,000 | 1,220,000,000 | ||
| Yahoo | 729,000,000 | 732,000,000 | -3,000,000 |
| Bing | 728,000,000 | 731,000,000 | -3,000,000 |
Singular Movement
String Base Identity: jim
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 108,000,000 | 109,000,000 | -1,000,000 | |
| Yahoo | 621,000,000 | 672,000,000 | -10,000,000 |
| Bing | 626,000,000 | 626,000,000 |
Singular Movement
String Base Identity: vestor
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 1,380,000 | 1,370,000 | +10,000 | |
| Yahoo | 249,000 | 253,000 | -4,000 |
| Bing | 257,000 | 254,000 | +3,000 |
Singular Movement
String Base Identity: dotcom
Index |
Current Snapshot |
Last Snapshot |
Difference |
| 20,900,000 | 20,600,000 | +300,000 | |
| Yahoo | 22,900,000 | 23,400,000 | -500,000 |
| Bing | 22,900,000 | 23,400,000 | -500,000 |
? Movement not consistent with more visible and/or common variables in play, minor shift
!?! Movement not consistent with more visible and/or common variables in play, major shift
With Vestor toying with Top Gun Jester gestures, it is the pull-down pairings of Tim and Dotcom in Yahoo and Bing plus the 1.1 billion+ injection of entries into the Kim column that can raise an eyebrow or two. Aside from the Kardashian popularity factor in the Kim column, the suggestion of a template leak is not entirely impossible, however a collection of template leaks is more likely than any single or few sites containing the cause for the 1.1 billion catapult far above Yahoo and Bing. Look to the low end from the last snapshot in which Google was in reverse of its more common ratio result (Google last rather than first).